|

|
What
Volvo's previous V70 turbo wagon lacked in looks, it made up for
in terms of performance, and achieved numerous successes on the
racetracks of the world. Adrian Burford put the latest version
through its paces.
|

|
Volvo
is on a mission – a mission to engineer in some driver appeal to
go with their traditional blend of safety and strength.
To
speed up that process they’ve applied typically Scandinavian
logic, engineering three cars off the same platform thus saving
millions in development costs too. While there are differences in
wheelbase and overall length, the S80, V70 and the new S60 sedan
are all underpinned by the same basic hardware.
Interestingly
though, there is no S70, and the V70 wagon is a unique vehicle –
rather than being a wagon version of a sedan.
The
result is a wagon with presence, with an instantly recognizable
face. It is big by
any standards, with a 4 710 mm overall length and a 2 755 mm
wheelbase. It is wide of body at 1,8 metres excluding the mirrors
and the track front and rear is generous too. The near vertical
tailgate – flanked by those massive rear light clusters -- and
conservative sheet metal suggest that this is a loadlugger of
note, and luggage capacity bears this out.
However,
in T5 guise Volvo has positioned it as a “sportwagon”, by
fitting the potent turbocharged 2,3 litre five-pot. In test guise
it was fitted with the five-speed manual, but a two-pedal version
with the same number of ratios is also available.
Next
to the outgoing V70 it looks positively svelte, but most people
didn’t consider it particularly handsome. Rather, it remains
workmanlike it true Volvo fashion. |
Once
again the national characteristic shines through in the cabin. It
is cool, understated, straightforward. You don’t feel dazzled or
overwhelmed when you slide onto the well-padded chair, but nor do
you feel unimpressed. You feel immediately confident and relaxed.
There
are a number of touches to take the load off the driver: these
include electric windows with a one-touch function, split rearview
mirrors, good oddment storage, cupholders aft of the gearlever in
the centre console, a coat hook on the side of the passenger
headrest, and Volvo’s
trademark plastic clip to affix papers to the inside of the
windscreen.
Surprisingly,
doors don’t lock automatically, though the driver can do so at
the touch of a button. The driver’s seat is electrically
adjustable, and there’s a three-position memory, but it doesn’t
incorporate the setting for the steering column which must be
adjusted manually. |
The
V70 boasts an overall length of 4 710 mm and a wheelbase of 2 755
mm so it is a fairly big car. To put it in context, a 5-series
Beemer has a 2 830 mm wheelbase and a 4 775 overall length, but
the Volvo somehow looks bigger when you see it out on the road.
Being
front-wheel drive also means that it has been packaged with a view
to giving free rein
to the maximum amount of space, and it has a volumous cabin by any
standards. With the rear seats folded, there’s 1 850 mm of load
length – more than six foot in Imperial measure. While the load
area – rated at a maximum of a massive 1 641 litres – is king,
a number of touches suggest that comfort front and rear has not
been overlooked.
For
example, the rear seat back can be set to two positions – one
for comfort and another to enhance the load area. While there isn’t
a big difference between the two, reclining the seat back just a
few degrees makes for a significantly more natural posture, and
complements the comfortable seats and the generously proportioned
rear footwells.
The
test car came fitted with the optional child booster seats
(intended for youngsters between
the ages of three and 10) which easily flip up to facilitate the
correct positioning of the safety belt and the
headrest.
This
same attention to detail can be seen in the wide, flat luggage
area with the Swedes paying particular attention to the securing
of your load, whether it be your farm fresh eggs or your pets. A
number of options are available to personalise the vehicle to your
needs.
Front
seats are plush and lavishly upholstered in soft leather, the
driver able to find an ideal position thanks to the wide range of
adjustment available. |
The
first time you tackle the twisty bits confirms that the Volvo is a
car of considerable girth and length, and it certainly doesn’t
respond like a nimble sports car. Nor would you expect it to, what
with a kerb mass of 1
620 kg and a fair proportion of that over the front axle.
But
what disappoints in the Volvo once you start to press on is the
general inertness of the steering, and its vagueness at the
straight ahead position.
|
| While
there is plenty of grip and reasonable obedience to directional
changes, the lack of feedback and feel is disconcerting. With
its wide track, long wheelbase and high polar moment of inertia
(thanks to a large chunk of the car’s mass being positioned far
forward , away from the centre of rotation) the V70 is
exceptionally stable at speed with a ride which seems to smooth
out the faster you go. While it is mostly magic carpet stuff,
severe bumps |
 |
|
do
make their presence felt and sometimes heard. The low speed
ride is on the lumpy side, with occupants being made aware of most
irregularities – especially thanks to the lightly laden, firmly
sprung rear that a front-drive station wagon is invariably
burdened with.
Volvo
has still got a way to go if they’re going to take on the
Germans toe to toe. Switchgear and stalks are merely average for a
R280 000 motor car, we felt, while fit and finish is very good but
not exceptional. And the dashboard makes a terrible hollow sound,
when you give it a good thump in the area of the central speaker
grille.
|
This
is a remarkably fast car, yet it delivers its 184 kW punch with
surprising decorum. Get the performance down cleanly (which is
relatively easy) and it’ll launch itself down the test strip
with ever-increasing pace. Switch the traction control off, and
get the revs up too high, and you’ll leave loads of expensive
205/55 ZR16 Michelin rubber behind.
The
0 – 100 km/h dash is dispatched in a fraction over nine seconds,
but it is the pace at the end of the standing kilometre which is
so impressive. Just 29,2 seconds after starting the 1000 metre
dash you’re travelling at 190 km/h and still in fourth gear.
Flat out, the Volvo is good for a deceptive 239 km/h. By
comparison, a Beemer 330i (a sports saloon if ever there was one)
exits the kilometre at 191,6 km/h.
The
traction control works hard on anything that isn’t bone dry, and
doesn’t always hide the torque steer, but other than that the
drivetrain is impressive, though not everyone enjoyed the languid
action and wide gate of the manual shifter.
While
there’s loads of grunt, the turbo-ed five pot does sometimes
leave you flat footed. It needs around 2 500 on the tachometer
before it wakes up which is does briskly if not furiously in the
higher gears. From there on it builds progressively, thanks to an
even 330 Nm of torque between 2 400 and 5 200 revs/min.
Not
all of our overtaking or tractability tests make exciting reading,
mainly because in fourth and fifth gear you’re below that
crucial 2 400 revs/min barrier at the start of the test and need
to wait patiently for engine speed to build and for the turbo to
kick in. But 80 – 120 km/h in 8,6 seconds in fourth is scorching
by any standards, and in that particular test the tacho needle
scribes an arc from 2 400 to 3 500 revs so you’re in the
powerband all the way.
Even
so, you need to keep a hand near the gearlever if you’re not to
be caught out in the ebb and flow of traffic, but then that’s
the case with many turbos – especially at altitude.
The
V70’s brakes are well up to its rapid acceleration and
significant top speed, and in ideal conditions it’ll return to
standstill from 80 km/h in a little over 25 metres – a figure of
which even the most talented sports cars would be proud. Our test
unit – which had fairly high mileage by press car standards –
suffered from mild brake judder in normal operation, giving the
impression that the front discs had been hammered on more than one
occasion.
Fuel
consumption is not the engine’s strong point however, and the
car returned an average of 14,24 litres/100km, which included a
large percentage of open road cruising. |
As
with all Volvos, the list of safety equipment is a long one. As
well as the standard crumple zones and safety cage common to most
well-designed modern cars, the Volvo V70 also features the Side
Impact Protection System, anti-whiplash front seats, dual stage
driver’s airbag, front seat side airbags, and Volvo’s
Inflatable Curtain – which bursts from the headlining and
protects the head and neck. There is no passenger frontal airbag,
Volvo citing the location of portable child seats in that area as
reason not to fit a SRS as standard.
In
addition, all five seats have headrests, seatbelt tensioners, and
an anti-submarining design. The front seats also have force
limiters and automatic height adjusters – the latter feature not
universally popular with our testers.
The
cabin certainly has all the bells and whistles, many housed in
that formidable centre console. Here you’ll find a large format,
fully integrated sound system with CD front loader, with the
climate control below. Both feature clearly marked, chunky
controls and the sound from the former is to Volvo’s usually
high standards while the latter is intuitive to use.
There
is plenty of equipment, and as a result there are a number of
controls, those for the cruise control fitted to the four-spoke
steering wheel, while you can also change volume and channel from
the same location. Stalk controls are easy to use too, with wipers
one side of the steering column (adjustable for both rake and
reach) and high beam/indicators on the other. |
How
many people need a wagon that can travel at 240 km/h? Not many we
suspect, and those who do, would probably want something which is
more overtly sporty. Despite its obvious performance capability
and T5 nomenclature, the V70 just doesn’t look the part of the
sporty estate – it still like a good, old-fashioned station
wagon.
But
for the few who need the combination of massive power and equally
massive space, we would suggest the two-pedal version instead,
with Volvo’s excellent auto box a better companion for the turbo
engine. Either way, they’d both get the family to its
destination in double-quick time, it’s just that the auto would
be slightly less tiring. |
|
Viewpoint
If you're
needing to lug the family and half of your house off to the
timeshare resort or holiday home for a week or two, few vehicles
could better cope with the load. Similarly, when it comes to
passenger comfort while on the go, the Volvo is right up near
the top of the class. The cabin is sumptuously furnished and
combined with its velvety five cylinder engine and impeccably
smooth ride on the highway, it is certainly a very pleasant place
to while away the monotony of a long journey. Provided the engine
revs are kept over the two and a half thousand mark, acceleration
is breathtaking and overtaking a breeze, all the better to reduce
the stresses associated with holiday traffic. At R277990 you get
an awful lot of performance, and in terms of size, an awful lot of
car.
But all in
the entire package is not flawless. Two chassis variations are
available. The V70 T5 is fitted with the sport variation, which on
dirt roads transmits plenty of noise, vibrations and bumps through
to the cabin, and it is likely that sustained gravel road use will
bring out the rattles to stay. Probably the 2.4 or 2.4T with the
comfort setting is the better option under these conditions. On
the other hand, the all wheel drive XC is probably best for that
job.
While most
of the requisite safety equipment is there, the exclusion of a
front passenger airbag is in my opinion, a serious omission. While
Volvo claim that this is in the interests of the safety of
children occupying the passenger seat, other manufacturers provide
a switch to disable the airbag if a child seat is installed, or
better still, more recent launches include a sensor to
automatically take care of this. Another issue is the fact that
although the front seatbelts have an auto-height adjusting
mechanism, shorter drivers will find the seatbelt uncomfortable
around the neck. The omission of mod cons like auto-headlights-on
and a rain sensor from a modern car selling at well over a quarter
of a million rand is disappointing.
A strange
deadness of steering in the few degrees either side of, and in the
straight-ahead position, an almost truck-like gate to the manual
shifter, a big steering wheel and a huge turning circle do not
really marry well with the sporty aspirations of the vehicle.
Despite this the Volvo handles exceptionally well and a spirited
drive through some tight Mpumalanga hairpins soon revealed that
the average motorist is likely to lose his nerve long before the
fine chassis loses its grip, yet the vehicle still feels more like
a utility wagon than a sport wagon to drive.
There are
four possible choices in this category. The Audi A6 Avant at a
substantially more expensive R317600, the Mercedes-Benz E320
Estate at a whopping R428 700, and the Saab 9-5 2.3 T at R262 000
(Prices valid at 15th January 2001). On performance
alone, The Volvo has them all beat while only the huge Mercedes
offers more space. The Saab might nose in ahead of the Volvo in
terms of build quality, turbo response and steering feel but can’t
match the pace or space of the Volvo, and if it’s pace and space
you’re looking for, the V70 delivers both in generous measure.
Herman
Bernitz |
|
|
| Volvo
V70 T5 Manual |
| Acceleration
(seconds) |
| 0
– 60 km/h |
4.44 |
| 0
– 80 km/h |
6.28 |
| 0
– 100 km/h |
9.12 |
| 0
– 120 km/h |
11.92 |
| 0
– 400 metres |
16.37 |
| Terminal
speed |
145.75
km/h |
| 0
– 1 000 metres |
29.19 |
| Terminal
speed |
189,4
km/h |
| |
|
| Flexibility
(seconds) |
| 60
– 100 km/h (4th gear) |
9.88 |
| 60
– 100 km/h (5th gear) |
16.02 |
| 80
– 120 km/h (4th gear) |
8.48 |
| 80
– 120 km/h (5th gear) |
12.66 |
| |
|
| Braking
(80 – 0 km/h) |
| Best |
25,1
metres/2.27 secs |
| Worst |
27,3
metres/2.42secs |
| |
|
| Speeds
in gears |
| 1st |
54,5
km/h |
| 2nd |
96,5
km/h |
| 3rd |
154,5
km/h |
| 4th |
215,0
km/h |
| 5th |
239,0 |
| per
1000 revs/min in top |
31,7
km/h |
| |
|
|
Speedometer
error |
| At
60 km/h |
7,5
% |
| At
80 km/h |
7,5
% |
| At
100 km/h |
5,7
% |
| At
120 km/h |
6,7
% |
| Odometer
error |
0,14
% |
| |
|
| Kerb
mass (measured with a full tank of
fuel) |
| Total |
1620
kg |
| Front |
900
kg |
| Rear |
720
kg |
| Weight
distribution (%) |
56/44 |
|
|